copyright

 


CEA ad

The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) attacks the record label industry for their attempt to outlaw recording of digital radio (space and time shifting, as the RIAA calls it).

This could be a first sign of a new, if loose alliance between consumers and electronics producers:

The electronics producers, because they wanna sell their products with all the features they developed, that is: to make a cool product. (Keep in mind that iPods and other mp3players, for example, would be nearly completely useless if the RIAA got their way.)

And we consumers because we want to listen to the music we bought where we want to. (Can you imagine buying a book you're only to read at home, on your desk, while sitting on the same chair you were sitting on when you bought the book? "What do you mean, you'd like to read in in the subway - did you pay extra for that?")

The most powerful thing the CEA could do is if their members stop manufacturing tech that controls their customers (as DRM measures do) and instead enables them to use the data in every possible way.

[via Boing Boing]

 


With ripping space and time shifting of music and other digital content now being declared illegal bei the RIAA (see my older post here for the links), I wonder: According to this argumentation, would it also be illegal to digitize my CD collection? Like, the whole box and a half of a few hundred CDs, which I bought way before these ultra-restrictive laws even got discussed? When it was still understood that if you bought an album, it belonged to you? At least in the sense that you could use it in whichever way you felt comfortable with? (The exception being, of course, re-selling the content somewhere else.)

 


"Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from Cyberspace, the new home of Mind. On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather."

Remember those lines, written 10 years ago? Today, the situation is different, and then it isn't.

Our home, the web has been changing the world - our world, and yours - and still is. While some of you are still the same, we have evolved, got organized, got networked. But today, we want to talk about music and digital culture.

You weary giants of the CD and DVD industry, you who torture us with cell phone ringtones and crappy release windows. We don't want to get rid of you just for the sake of it. You're welcome at our party - as long as you know how to behave. This is our party, not yours. You are dependent on us, not the other way around.

Over the last years you've been hurting music with your business models from the last century. You've been bothering and insulting us with your stupid, so-called Digital Rights Management technologies. You have endangered music itself by trying to force upon us your restrictive laws.

None of this worked, or ever will. But it tought us not to rely on you anymore, and not to listen to you.

You are still stuck in the 20th century.

For decades, you have asked - and expected - us to trust you: To find, develop and produce music and bands. But you let us down. We know the music we like; That we'll use, remix and mash-up music and movies in ways you can't even imagine yet; And that we'll pay the artists for our music, but on our terms.

Just relax and let go. Here are some proposals how to do it better. Maybe you've even thought of some of them yourselves:

- Get rid of Digital Rights Management. It doesn't work, it's restrictive, and it sucks.

- Cut down on marketing and focus on A&R. If we need to be brainwashed into buying a song, it's not worth producing it.

- Stop suing music fans. There's no reason to play rough, we're all here to have a good time. If we download songs, take it as a compliment: You helped produce a good song. Once the appropriate revenue mechanisms are in place, we'll pay the artists for their efforts directly.

- Your role has changed. You're not irreplacably in the center of the music universe or our attention. You won't be able to sue us into believing that, either. You're there to help artists publish their songs and to support them. Do that, and do it well. Then you'll always have a nice and comfy spot among us.

- Help us introduce a music flat fee. Everybody would pay a little for unlimited access to music. There'd be more than enough money to pay the artists their share, and to pay them fairly according to how often a song was downloaded exactly.

There are many more, and we'll be glad to hear you propose them.

We don't want to get rid of you: In the past, you've done some pretty cool things. But if need be, we will. So change, and stay in the game. Or you won't be welcome at our party anymore. And once you're out, you stay out.

So we have an offer for you: Stop fighting against us, against your customers, against your artists. Instead, come over to our party. It's better for you, for us, for the artists and for music itself.

 


[A new proposed set of amendments to the US's loathsome DMCA] would send you to prison for attempting to infringe copyright. It would make it even more illegal to own tools that could be used to remove copy-restrictions, like DVD-ripping software -- it could even bust Symantec for making software that removed the Sony rootkit malicious software that the company distributed with its CDs last year:

"This is a concerted effort to escalate Hollywood's war on America by creating a generation of criminals and sending them off to jail. That's right: the "Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006" (IPPA) would double the authorized prison terms for existing copyright infringement, create a host of new offenses, and establish a division within the FBI to hunt down infringers. The Members of Congress in the pockets of the Hollywood cartels want to divert $20 million a year and FBI agents from fighting real criminals so they can go after people without computers."


Cory Doctorow on Boing Boing about the new situtation American users could find themselves in if RIAA and IFPI and this weirdo get their will. Here's IPac's page to fight the bill.

 


I couldn't help but chuckle at Tom Giovanetti's post today concerning his inability to back up his favorite shows from his PVR, which crashed last night. As he laments:

"The problem is, we have been using the PVR to record 2 years worth of a Spanish language curriculum that is broadcast over an educational channel, and we've been using this content to teach our son Spanish. Now the curriculum is gone. It's not like I'm just inconvenienced in not being able to watch my "24" episodes. An educational curriculum is lost."

For those who aren't familiar with Mr. Giovanetti's work, he's a frequent and pugnacious commentator on intellectual property issues, and an avowed supporter of the DMCA and digital rights management technologies. He's a frequent critic of "IP skeptics" and "commonists" who argue that copyright law--and the technological measures designed to protect copyright--have gone overboard.

Today he discovered that sometimes, technological measures designed to deter piracy are a pain in the ass for ordinary consumers--like him.

Here's a radical proposition: Mr. Giovanetti should be permitted to make a backup copy of the television programs on his PVR, as long as his use of that mateiral stays within the bounds of copyright law.* Moreover, someone else should be permitted to sell him a device allowing him to do so. And finally--here's the truly radical part--it should be legal to manufacture such a device without getting a license from Dish to do so.


Tim Lee about the absurdity of DRM, and how it seems to just get everyone...

 


TWENFM proudly presents

RIP IT! - Reappropriate Popular Culture
International Video and Musicfestival Berlin
20-22. April 2006

Diebstahl, Aneignung und Neuverwertung von Ideen bestimmen
die zeitgenössischen Kulturproduktion all over! Rip It! präsentiert
aktuelle und stilprägende Musik- und Videoproduktionen von
Protagonisten der Copyart-, Sampling-, Mash-Up- und Remix-Culture
und anderen den Mainstream piratisierenden und ironisierenden
Kulturproduzenten.

EXHIBITION - LECTURES - WORKSHOPS - SCREENINGS
täglich von 14- 23h

LIVE MUSIC - PARTY
täglich ab 23h

mit T.Raumschmiere & Band (D), The Juan Mac Lean (DFA, UK)
Eclectic Method (UK) , I-F (NL), Osymsyo (UK), SCSI-9 (RU) u.a.

im club 103, Falckensteinstr.47
Berlin-Kreuzberg

ERÖFFNUNG ***
am Donnerstag 20.April 06
ab 19h

20-22h
Live Performance von
Frau Berlin (D)
Serhat Köksal (TUR)
und Kodwo Eshun (UK)

ab 23h
DJ I-F (Cybernetic Broadcasting System, NL), Diskokaine (A), Benji DF (D)
VJ Daniel Pflumm (D)

*** Eintritt frei bis 23 Uhr

[Link] Thanks, Christoph!

 


Pirate-Parrrty

The remixes/mash-ups should feature at least 10 seconds of recognizeable pirates (the traditional ARRR MATEY sea-going pirates)

 


The other word is "fear." Fear that keeps me awake at night and distracted in class. Fear of my May sentencing date (I pleaded guilty in March) in the same courthouse as Zacarias Moussaoui; fear of the possible prison time I am facing; fear of my job prospects when I graduate college in December with a felony criminal record; and fear for the future I've recklessly damaged.
Mickey Borchardt is a student at University of North Carolina. He's being sentenced for copyright infringements. He shared music online.

Another future destroyed for...what?

 


Hollywood is embracing new digital options for getting movies to consumers, but more aggressive innovation could take place with more secure content protection, the MPAA told a congressional panel today.
What the MPAA said in this press release a few days ago is that more restrictive digital rights management (DRM) leads to more creativity? Uh-huh. Think again.

According to an LA Times article, ...

...major studios today will make mainstream movies available for downloading the same day they are released on DVD — a significant step in Hollywood's tentative migration to the Internet.

However, the article also tells that the download will cost twice the price of the DVD, and it's gonna be available for Windows PCs only. Twice! What the heck are those guys thinking? Oh wait, here's the answer:

"We think this is a great consumer offering that complements the DVD release," said Rick Finkelstein, Universal Pictures' president and chief operating officer.

How about this model: All the majors set up download servers, where you can download (as in rent) a movie when you want to watch it. You pay via PayPal - $0.99 to $2.99 should be fine. Period. Why even protect the movie? The movies are out there anyway, ripped, screened, burned, whatever. But who would take the effort of even copying it if you can have just the movie you want, when you want it, in a guaranteed high quality, for just two bucks? It'd be a clear win/win situation.

If people put the stuff online afterwards, who would lose anything? You'd never get the movies you wanna watch as quick via BitTorrent as you'd get them off the Universal / Warner / whatever server. So there is this huge, fat market, and all they need to do - all you need to do, Rick Finkelstein - is feed it, I volunteer to be the first to rent a dozen movies right away, under the conditions stated above.

(Remember, I will never buy a regional code protected DVD again, as they tend to lock my DVD player software.)

[via boing boing]

 


Bound by Law is Creative Commons explained as a fancy online comic by the Duke UniversityCenter for the Study of the Public Domain. (And it comes with this really cool flash-page-turn-effect, too.) Not bad, actually!

[via Joi Ito]

[Search]

 

[what else?]

+ About
+ Impressum
+ plusnine im blogtree
+ baggle wishlist

[swarm convenience]

[Status]

Online for 1239 days
Last update: 13. Oct, 10:16

[Credits & Support to]


(soon to be) classic links
biographies 2.0
campaigns
connected world
copyright
culturally insensitive
dev
edge
forthelooks
game over
google earth
hacks
klarer richtungswahlkampf
koerperfunktionen
life hacks
mash-up
... more
Profil
Logout
Subscribe Weblog